<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mac Vs. Pc &#8211; More Ramblings About Vista SP3&#8230;&#8230;Wait&#8230;&#8230;.I mean Windows 7.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/</link>
	<description>Help and advice on running Windows 7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 03:38:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkspy946</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkspy946</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-863</guid>
		<description>7 = Vista SP3?
If that&#039;s the case, then Snow Leopard = Leopard 10.5.9 being that it isn&#039;t much different.

Mac users that bash on Windows 7 for being similar to Vista are complete hypocrites...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7 = Vista SP3?<br />
If that&#8217;s the case, then Snow Leopard = Leopard 10.5.9 being that it isn&#8217;t much different.</p>
<p>Mac users that bash on Windows 7 for being similar to Vista are complete hypocrites&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacintoshArmy</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>MacintoshArmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-860</guid>
		<description>more durable, macs are not as durable although they are not bad laptops. durable is very important to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more durable, macs are not as durable although they are not bad laptops. durable is very important to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleSoldier</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleSoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-861</guid>
		<description>i argue its not. In fact, in some areas XP is faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i argue its not. In fact, in some areas XP is faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AppleSoldier</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>AppleSoldier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-862</guid>
		<description>That is completely ASS TALK. Everything you say is bullshit. Itunes runs perfect, if it dont on windows. well, i dont care. I dont use windows.

You calling out apple for installing &quot;unnecessary junk&quot; And This is coming from a windows user. HA, thats a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is completely ASS TALK. Everything you say is bullshit. Itunes runs perfect, if it dont on windows. well, i dont care. I dont use windows.</p>
<p>You calling out apple for installing &#8220;unnecessary junk&#8221; And This is coming from a windows user. HA, thats a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manjyoumethunder</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>manjyoumethunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-857</guid>
		<description>And Windows 2000 would probably be even faster on a modern machine, because it uses less resources!

The point is, these OSes do less out of the box, are less secure and unsupported. Even if they have marginally better performance in some random ass application, they&#039;re not meant to be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Windows 2000 would probably be even faster on a modern machine, because it uses less resources!</p>
<p>The point is, these OSes do less out of the box, are less secure and unsupported. Even if they have marginally better performance in some random ass application, they&#8217;re not meant to be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manjyoumethunder</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-858</link>
		<dc:creator>manjyoumethunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-858</guid>
		<description>Microsoft doesn&#039;t include unnecessary junk with Windows, OEMs install it after they install Windows. Almost everything in Windows is useful to some extent for the average user.

iTunes does run poorly on OS X, it uses a large amount of RAM and CPU on my friend&#039;s MacBook. Compared to other music programs, such as SongBird, it&#039;s bloated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft doesn&#8217;t include unnecessary junk with Windows, OEMs install it after they install Windows. Almost everything in Windows is useful to some extent for the average user.</p>
<p>iTunes does run poorly on OS X, it uses a large amount of RAM and CPU on my friend&#8217;s MacBook. Compared to other music programs, such as SongBird, it&#8217;s bloated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cuallito</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-859</link>
		<dc:creator>cuallito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-859</guid>
		<description>Lol, hillbilly computer nerd, I love it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, hillbilly computer nerd, I love it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mukatuna</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>mukatuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-854</guid>
		<description>Eric you do know I use Macs as well as Windows. So I see PCs and Macs from all sides, and not a narrow blinkered BS Cupertino tainted image of things which you so obviously do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric you do know I use Macs as well as Windows. So I see PCs and Macs from all sides, and not a narrow blinkered BS Cupertino tainted image of things which you so obviously do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mukatuna</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>mukatuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-855</guid>
		<description>So says Eric the fanboi who&#039;s never used Windows in a month of Sundays.

I don&#039;t even use iTunes on a Mac because its crap and always falling over. One just drags the MP3s to the SONY WALKMAN or one uses DoubleTwist. 

I use a SONY WALKMAN because the SQ on iPods just sucks so bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So says Eric the fanboi who&#8217;s never used Windows in a month of Sundays.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even use iTunes on a Mac because its crap and always falling over. One just drags the MP3s to the SONY WALKMAN or one uses DoubleTwist. </p>
<p>I use a SONY WALKMAN because the SQ on iPods just sucks so bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manjyoumethunder</title>
		<link>http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>manjyoumethunder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://runningwindows7.com/mac-vs-pc-more-ramblings-about-vista-sp3-wait-i-mean-windows-7/#comment-856</guid>
		<description>1. No, it has terrible support. The Ubuntu forums do not count.
2. Sure, it may be a joke, but at least I&#039;m entitled to it through my warranty.
3. It&#039;s the wrong tool for the wrong job. Using an interpreted language for something that&#039;s constantly running = no.
5. Yeah, because we all know WINE is perfectly implemented and takes absolutely no performance hits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. No, it has terrible support. The Ubuntu forums do not count.<br />
2. Sure, it may be a joke, but at least I&#8217;m entitled to it through my warranty.<br />
3. It&#8217;s the wrong tool for the wrong job. Using an interpreted language for something that&#8217;s constantly running = no.<br />
5. Yeah, because we all know WINE is perfectly implemented and takes absolutely no performance hits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
