My Rig: Motherboard: MSI MS-7501 Hard Drive: Western Digital 500 GB ATA Processor: AMD Phenom II X4 965 @ 3.4 Ghz. With Arctic Cooling Freezer Extreme Rev. 2 Graphic Card: ATI HD5750 512MB Audio Card: Realtek High Defition 7.1 Ram: 3 GB DDR2 667 Mhz Monitor: Samsung SyncMaster 2032BW Speakers: Logitech Z 2300 2.1 Keyboard: Logitech G15 Mouse: Logitech G9 Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64 Bit Enjoy and feel free to subscribe.
25 Comments For This Post
Leave a Reply
- kotemanis: thanks man... i will try this.... :D...
- hoyaamusic: Yeeeahh!!! Cool Coool...It works . ..Awsome job ;)...
- SylphViper: @david02099 The reason it's not appearing is becau...
- dilwalaforyou: Great work man!! Thanks a lot!!...
- libyanspartan: YOU ARE AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!...
- Windows7 What’s different
- Windows 7 Upgrade Advisor
- Microsoft issues first Windows 7 patches – Computerworld New Zealand
- The Week in Geek: 10.25.09 – GeekSmack
- Kindle software coming to Mac OS X – tuaw.com (blog)
- Six free antivirus programs made for your Windows 7 system – Downloadsquad (blog)
- Windows 7 Japan burp-a-thon – p2pnet.net
- Podcast: Windows 7, Droid, Acer Aspire One, Net Neutrality – Reuters
- Raindrop is Mozilla’s diet version of Google Wave – India Today
- PC World Podcast Episode 50: Windows 7, Droid, Acer Aspire One, and Net Neutrality – PC World
"Mac
activation
aero
apple
beta
blog
build
computer
download
features
free
gadgets
hd
help
how
information
install
iphone
Macbook
microsoft
operating
os
Pc"
pcwizkid
pirillo
Pro
review
RTM
seven
Software
system
taskbar
tech
to
touch
tutorial
Ultimate
upgrade
video
vista
win7
windows
windows 7
windows7
xp
Asides 
The curtain has been raised (slightly) on the next installment of Microsoft’s Windows operating system – Windows 7.
Microsoft hope it will bring the internet, mobile phone and PC closer together. But reviews have so far been mixed, although reviewers have been limited to trying the (pre-beta version).
The full version is expected to be capable of working with a touchscreen screen, navigating documents and the Web similar to Apple’s iPhone. It is officially released at the end of 2009.
“I have seen the future, and it is bleak. Windows 7, the next big version, the one that was supposed to fix everything that was wrong with Vista, is here (at least in pre-beta form), and I can now say – with some confidence – that Microsoft has once again dropped the ball.
“Overall, I’m extremely disappointed with Windows 7. Far from atoning for Vista’s sins, Windows 7 simply carries them forward, visiting them upon yet another generation. Windows 7 is no panacea. Rather, it’s just more of the same: slow, bloated, and frustrating as hell.”
“When it comes to Windows 7, Microsoft hasn’t just learned from the mistakes of Windows Vista. It has picked up a thing or two from Apple’s OS X, judging by first impressions.
“It’s not clear how big the changes are so far. If you put the beta-build of Windows 7 side-by-side with Windows Vista, you’d be hard-pressed to spot the differences. Yes, some of the icons look slightly different and there’s no sidebar, but it’s essentially still the Vista look and feel. But that changes when you start to use Windows 7.
“For a start the OS won’t nag you as much; many notifications are banished to a control panel, you get to approve icons before they show up in the system tray and Microsoft has reined in Vista’s useful but annoying UAC prompts; you can choose which ones you want to see or turn them off altogether.”
“Initially Windows 7 looks similar to Vista, but there a lot of new features that have been added. Under the skin, Microsoft has been working hard. Boot times have been reduced, and certainly the review laptop Microsoft provided has a fairly snappy boot time.
“Microsoft has been working with OEMs to improve battery life – simple things such as reducing the timer frequency can improve battery life by up to 10 per cent. The networking stack has had new diagnostics added to help users figure out exactly where the problem lies.
“So, is this all a big deal? It’s not a change to the fundamental core of Windows, and most of the improvements sound relatively small. But taken together, they seem to address many of the issues people have had for Windows. I’m looking forward to trying it out, starting this afternoon.”
Translator
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  | ||||||||||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||
at 3:37 pm
@Svyatpro While that last sentence is true since nothing beats Linux, I have to ask for your hardware configuration and if it was really XP x64 that you compared it to. “Mid-rage” could mean anything.
at 3:37 pm
@NDogg15, XP x64 isn’t terrible. it may be terrible only because of terrible hands. I’ve recently installed Win7 on mid-range computer, and tested it in a lot of benchmarks, and it was almost everywhere behind of XP!!!!!! Thats the facts! XP won’t. I’ll better move on Linux than to Se7en.
at 3:37 pm
What does OS have to do with gaming performance?? it’s your hardware not the OS.
And there’s something very wrong with these tests because I have windows xp 32bit and also windows 7 32bit and ALL my games run faster on my windows XP. You either fucked up the XP settings somewhere or you did something wrong. There’s no way XP would have 30 less fps than windows 7 since OS don’t even factor that much in gaming performance.
at 3:37 pm
Ok just to let people know “Windows 7″ is faster than Xp BUT windows 7 uses more system resorces Dx 11 makes it run faster for games and xp uses less resorces but dx 9 makes game just run theres not real boost in 9
at 3:37 pm
@Svyatpro First of all, the reason XP lost is because XP x64 is a terrible, terrible OS even compared to Vista x64.
Second, move on. ATi kicks nVida’s ass in terms of performance, power consumption, and low heat production. Keeping XP is not worth using inferior over-priced graphics cards, and really I don’t understand why people like you are so adamant about keeping XP alive. It’s almost 10 years old; just let it die.
at 3:37 pm
Windows 7 is faster not only in games…
at 3:37 pm
Such a great performance difference caused through crapped ATi drivers, on nVidia Video card, Windows XP will win. ATi forgot about XP, but I forgot about ATi.
at 3:37 pm
@alonsotallica
you are not so far from the truth, W7 is on a higher league
at 3:37 pm
@Gaming4WholeLife hey i wanne ask you something what the best version for gaming is there a differents between 32 or 64 bit and what from version windows 7 you run???
at 3:37 pm
fake xp is better for games because do not have aero or anothers things for just looks nice!!
at 3:37 pm
wat about team fortress 2 better on xp or seven?
at 3:37 pm
I THING THAT WINDOWS XP ITS LIKE PS2 AND WINDOWS 7 ITS LIKE PS3 LOL :d
at 3:37 pm
wow 179fps on dead space so getting windows7
at 3:37 pm
Thanks for putting some real numbers with the video!
at 3:37 pm
@WeedlessProductions “All the games run slow in it.”? Really? DX11 is optimized for multiple cores, better AA performance, better at high res and effects (shadows, detailed textures) etc..
XP interface is crap BTW, slow and laggy. Have you ever tried to read a scratched CD/DVD in XP? The hole system freezes for minutes lol! This never happens in windows 7. In the new games you’ll get better performance in windows 7 especially on new hardware..End of story!
at 3:37 pm
@WeedlessProductions “All the games run slow in it.”? Really? DX11 is optimized for multiple cores, better AA performance, better at high res and effects (shadows, detailed textures) etc..
XP interface is crap BTW, slow and laggy. Have you ever tried to read a scratched CD/DVD in XP? The hole system freezes for minutes lol! This never happens in windows 7. In the new games you’ll get better performance in windows 7 especially on new hardware..End of story!
at 3:37 pm
@SuperiorBeen I don’t like the interface for windows 7. Its too bloated and not straight forward. You have to dig to get to the advanced options. Windows 7 isn’t faster though. I’ve had it on other machines before and i’ve loaded it on friends machines. It would be much better if i could change everything to look like xp but have the engine of windows 7 below the skin. Directx11 is nothing in windows 7 right now. All the games run slow in it. Will be slow for along time until windows 8.
at 3:37 pm
@WeedlessProductions you have crossfired 4890s and you’re still using XP? loool That’s pathetic. Better use DOS I’ve heard it use even less ram and cpu cycles..haha
Windows 7 FTW, DirectX11 FTW
at 3:37 pm
Your results are way off. I don’t even get that low frames rate on xp x64. This video is biased. I have crossfired 4890s in xp x64. The games are faster in xp x64 than windows 7 as 7 eats up more cpu cycles than xp x64 during the game. Xp x64 consumes less ram than windows 7. I play all the latest games on it also. You have something not setup right or your drivers need to be setup correctly. Sorry to say but somethings definitely wrong here.
at 3:38 pm
@mnbgkjygvbu All updates is installed in Windows Xp.
at 3:38 pm
@chillypepper i dont think windows 7 is “faster” its just gives better performance in games
at 3:38 pm
@chillypepper70 no it is not faster, dont believe what you see in this video
at 3:38 pm
You get low fps on xp because you didnt installed the amd hotfix for multi cores processors
at 3:38 pm
hard to admit it, but 7 > XP. opposite of Vista.
at 3:38 pm
So overall windows 7 is a faster os?